<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Zej Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zejmedia.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zejmedia.com</link>
	<description>Process and Content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:50:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael &amp; Us at The Brinks Job by bzd</title>
		<link>http://www.zejmedia.com/2009/09/30/the-brinks-job-michael-us/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>bzd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zejmedia.com/?p=628#comment-244</guid>
		<description>I just saw Capitalism, A Love Story last night.  It was a good film, a bit overly dramatic at times, but it is important to hear the other side of the story.  Overall, my general thought is that business just works MUCH better when the workers, employees, etc. are the owners of the company and direct the company decisions.  Buying and selling shares of companies through an obscured 3rd market auction system, driven through Wall Street in NY really doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense for most contexts.  In the end, free markets are still proven in regards to their effectiveness to drive innovation and progress.  However, markets in a theoretically completely &quot;free&quot; environment are just anarchy, which is more destructive than progressive.  Now the big question is how do we reconcile our current system to work for the good of the country as a whole?  I will leave my comment at this point in hopes of fostering further discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw Capitalism, A Love Story last night.  It was a good film, a bit overly dramatic at times, but it is important to hear the other side of the story.  Overall, my general thought is that business just works MUCH better when the workers, employees, etc. are the owners of the company and direct the company decisions.  Buying and selling shares of companies through an obscured 3rd market auction system, driven through Wall Street in NY really doesn&#39;t make a lot of sense for most contexts.  In the end, free markets are still proven in regards to their effectiveness to drive innovation and progress.  However, markets in a theoretically completely &#8220;free&#8221; environment are just anarchy, which is more destructive than progressive.  Now the big question is how do we reconcile our current system to work for the good of the country as a whole?  I will leave my comment at this point in hopes of fostering further discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Collaterally Damaged, mini clip, take 3 by Zohar Rom</title>
		<link>http://www.zejmedia.com/2009/06/30/433/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Zohar Rom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zejmedia.com/?p=433#comment-23</guid>
		<description>The draft is intriguing, ambitious and chipper. Rather than so much voiceover, I&#039;d love to see her in her element, very early on, talking from the stage briefly and getting an audience reaction. Also, I don&#039;t know why we need to see her lying on the bed instead of leaping into the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The draft is intriguing, ambitious and chipper. Rather than so much voiceover, I&#8217;d love to see her in her element, very early on, talking from the stage briefly and getting an audience reaction. Also, I don&#8217;t know why we need to see her lying on the bed instead of leaping into the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
